A New Jersey nurse says she was suspended after calling out a surgeon who allegedly cheered the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk — and she’s now taking her fight to court.
The Incident
According to a lawsuit, the controversy began on September 10, when news broke that Kirk had been fatally shot during a campus event at Utah Valley University. Nurse Michelle Kuenzle says bariatric surgeon Dr. Matthew Jung reacted by openly celebrating in front of her, several colleagues, and even a patient.
Shocked, Kuenzle reportedly responded: “Oh my God! That’s terrible! I love him.”
Dr. Jung allegedly shot back: “I hate Charlie Kirk. He had it coming. He deserved it.”
Kuenzle says she immediately challenged him, asking how a doctor could justify such a statement. Later, in an interview, she described his words as “mind-blowing” and said she was “angry and upset.”
The lawsuit notes that Jung later tried to soften the moment by offering to buy lunch for the group.
Suspension and Legal Fight
After reporting the incident to management and posting about it on social media, Kuenzle says she was suspended without pay the next day and warned that termination was likely.
Her attorney, John Coyle, argues that Englewood Health retaliated against her for speaking up and for her Christian faith, violating the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination and the Conscientious Employee Protection Act. He says the hospital also fostered a hostile work environment.
Kuenzle is requesting a jury trial and damages.
Hospital’s Response
Englewood Health confirmed both Kuenzle and Dr. Jung were suspended during the ongoing investigation.
“Contrary to certain media reports, the nurse was not fired,” the hospital told Fox News, adding that suggestions she should “seek other employment” did not reflect official policy.
As of Sunday, Jung’s profile had been removed from the hospital’s website.
Political Undercurrents
Kuenzle, a vocal conservative, frequently posts pro-Trump content on social media. Her case has already gained attention from GOP activists, including Scott Presler, who defended her online and questioned whether Dr. Jung could treat patients fairly if politics influence his judgment.
The controversy has sparked heated debate over workplace ethics, free speech, and professional responsibility. Should challenging a colleague’s remarks cost someone their job — or is holding doctors accountable for such comments necessary for trust in healthcare?
